ANTALYA — As the 31st United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP31) officially kicked off in Antalya, Turkey, with delegates from roughly 200 nations gathering to chart global climate strategies, a familiar controversy has taken center stage. Questions are mounting over whether Turkey possesses the moral authority and practical climate commitment required to lead the global summit.

This skepticism echoes criticisms leveled against recent host nations. Brazil (COP30), Azerbaijan (COP29), and the United Arab Emirates (COP28) all faced intense backlash for continuing fossil fuel production while serving as climate stewards. Turkey now faces similar scrutiny, weighed down by its status as a major global methane emitter and its heavy reliance on coal power. Environmental watchdogs warn that these contradictions among successive presidency nations risk undermining global consensus on critical climate action.

A Growing Methane Footprint

According to data released by the non-profit climate research group Climate TRACE, Turkey ranks as the world’s sixth-largest emitter of methane, following China, India, the United States, Russia, and Brazil. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas with a global warming potential roughly 80 times greater than carbon dioxide over a 20-year timescale, driven largely by fossil fuel extraction and municipal waste management.

What compounds Turkey's criticism is the rapid escalation of its emissions. Over the past decade (2014–2026), Turkey’s methane emissions surged by approximately 25%—four times the global average increase of 6.5% over the same period.

Recent satellite observations underscore the severity of the crisis. Data captured by the Tanager-1 satellite between January of last year and May of this year, analyzed by the UCLA Methane Project research team, revealed that a major municipal solid waste landfill in Seymen, near Istanbul, was leaking methane at a staggering rate of approximately 7.4 tons per hour. This marks one of the highest emission rates recorded at any major methane source worldwide.

Heavy Reliance on Fossil Fuels

Turkey also remains shackled to fossil fuels. Last year, coal-fired power plants accounted for 33.3% of the nation’s total electricity generation. When combined with natural gas power (22.3%), fossil fuels make up over half of the country’s energy mix.

While the United Kingdom has already phased out coal power, and other major European economies are targeting phase-outs around 2030, Turkey has yet to establish a concrete roadmap to abandon coal. Notably, the phase-out of coal power was omitted from the official agenda at this year's summit.

A Pattern of Host Country Contradictions

The dilemma of host country qualifications is far from new. COP28 in the UAE drew widespread accusations of conflicts of interest when Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber, CEO of the state-owned oil giant ADNOC (and the UAE’s Minister of Industry and Advanced Technology), served as summit president. At COP29, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev drew international ire during his opening speech by describing oil and gas as a “gift from God.” These episodes ultimately crippled efforts to forge a binding global roadmap for fossil fuel phase-outs.

Similarly, COP30 host Brazil championed Amazon rainforest protection and proposed an international "Tropical Forests Forever Facility" (TFFF) fund. However, investigative reporting during the summit exposed massive deliberate clear-cutting and fires set by agricultural developers deep within the Amazon basin in Para state. Deep divisions over national forestry responsibilities ultimately led to the collapse of the funding agreement.

Rising Demands for Alternative Voices

Amid these structural limitations, environmental and civil society organizations argue that government-led UN climate summits are increasingly incapable of delivering fundamental solutions.

As Turkey hosts COP31 in Antalya, roughly 300 climate and civil society groups are preparing to launch the "People’s Climate Summit" from November 14 to 18. Organizers argue that bureaucratic government delegations remain constrained by industrial interests, failing to reflect the urgent voices of local communities and everyday citizens. The alternative summit aims to spotlight real demands for the rapid phase-out of fossil fuels, structural energy transitions, and the defense of indigenous survival rights.

[ⓒ Global Economic Times. 무단전재-재배포 금지]