• 2025.10.26 (Sun)
  • All articles
  • LOGIN
  • JOIN
Global Economic Times
APEC2025KOREA가이드북
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life
  • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Ko Yong-chul Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
  • Cherry Garden Story
MENU
 
Home > Opinion

Reebak School: Absurd Education and Children's Worrying Future

KO YONG-CHUL Reporter / Updated : 2025-07-10 13:17:07
  • -
  • +
  • Print


 

Concerns are mounting over the educational content of "Reebak School," which has recently become a hot topic in the education sector. While it champions innovative education, a closer look at its reality inevitably raises questions about whether this truly represents genuine education for our children's future. This column expresses deep concern about Reebak School's absurd educational content and the future our children may face as a result.

Education That's Beyond "Absurd" to "Dangerous" 

Reebak School's educational approach gained attention for completely breaking away from the traditional framework of school education. However, a detailed examination of its content reveals dangerous attempts that go beyond mere "breaking the mold" in many aspects.

Above all, the most concerning issue is the indiscriminate introduction of unverified pedagogical methods. There's an undeniable impression that, while neglecting the fundamental academic achievement crucial in formal curricula, the school forces ambiguous curricula based on specific ideologies or philosophies. For example, some parents have raised suspicions that Reebak School attempts to instill specific religious beliefs or social ideologies in children. This is a serious problem that could violate freedom of religion and the principle of educational neutrality, harboring the risk of trapping children in a particular viewpoint rather than fostering their critical thinking skills.

Furthermore, another problem is the uniform application of educational methods without considering children's developmental stages and characteristics. There are criticisms that, under the guise of fostering creativity, children are either given excessive freedom or, conversely, exposed to an uncontrollable environment. For instance, some parents have complained that during class, children wander freely or engage in uncontrolled activities, disrupting the learning atmosphere and causing safety issues. Children grow at different paces and in different ways, yet Reebak School appears to force children into their educational philosophy rather than respecting this individuality. This disregards basic principles of child developmental psychology and can diminish children's interest in learning and hinder their potential.

Moreover, Reebak School fuels controversy due to a lack of transparency in its educational content. Specific curricula, learning objectives, and evaluation methods are not clearly disclosed, causing anxiety among parents. This goes beyond mere lack of information, raising concerns that a closed educational environment could lead to child abuse or inappropriate educational practices. Education is a public domain, and particularly for education targeting growing children, its content and process must be transparently disclosed and verified.

Is Our Children's Future Alright Like This? 

The thought of the future of children educated at Reebak School fills one with unease. Modern society demands that children possess not only specific knowledge and skills but also the ability to cooperate with diverse people, solve problems, and adapt flexibly to change.

However, Reebak School's educational approach appears insufficient in fostering the basic social skills and critical thinking necessary for children to adapt to society and grow into healthy members. If children are instilled with only specific values in an isolated environment, they may feel disconnected from the real world after graduation and struggle to adapt. This could lead to serious social maladjustment and negatively impact interpersonal relationship formation.

Furthermore, the disadvantages that children who receive unverified education may face when advancing to higher education or entering society cannot be overlooked. If there's a lack of connection with the current education system, children are at risk of undergoing unnecessary trial and error or falling behind. For example, if Reebak School's unique curriculum does not help prepare for the CSAT (College Scholastic Ability Test) or internal school grades, children may find it difficult to enter their desired universities due to academic gaps with students from regular schools. This will ultimately prevent children from fully realizing their potential. This is not merely an academic problem; it could also limit career options or impede career development after entering society.

Education is the foundation that nurtures children's dreams and futures, but Reebak School's approach is inevitably criticized for potentially restricting children's future choices and suppressing their potential. True innovative education should help children achieve holistic growth and foster the capabilities to actively cope with a rapidly changing future society.

Education Is Not an Experiment 

Education is a critical process that determines children's future and should never be treated lightly. Indiscriminately applying unverified educational methods under the guise of innovation is no different from a dangerous experiment on children.

Even now, Reebak School must transparently disclose its educational content and methods and listen to the legitimate criticisms and concerns of parents and experts. Educational authorities must take these issues seriously and consider active intervention to protect children's right to learn and be happy. The Ministry of Education should conduct a thorough investigation into the institution's curriculum, teacher qualifications, and student management practices, and if necessary, take appropriate administrative measures.

For our children to grow up healthy and embrace a bright future, society-wide attention and oversight of dangerous educational attempts like Reebak School are urgently needed. It is crucial to remember that children's education is not merely about knowledge transfer but a vital process of character formation, and a cautious and responsible approach must be taken.

[Copyright (c) Global Economic Times. All Rights Reserved.]

  • #리박스쿨
  • #극우세력
  • #극우공산당
  • #globaleconomictimes
  • #micorea
  • #mykorea
  • #Lifeplaza
  • #nammidonganews
  • #singaporenewsk
  • #Taiwanpo
KO YONG-CHUL Reporter
KO YONG-CHUL Reporter
Reporter Page

Popular articles

  • The Imminent Reality: Donald Trump's Unlikelihood for the Nobel Peace Prize as a Destroyer of International Order

  • "Trump's Delusion for the Nobel Peace Prize: The Award He Deserves is 'The NO PEACE Prize'"

  • McDonald's 'Subtle Racism' Controversy: Korean American Denied Order After 70-Minute Wait

I like it
Share
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Kakaotalk
  • LINE
  • BAND
  • NAVER
  • https://www.globaleconomictimes.kr/article/1065586543647265 Copy URL copied.
Comments >

Comments 0

Weekly Hot Issue

  • Melody in the OR: Parkinson's Patient Plays Clarinet During Brain Surgery
  • South Korea to Launch Government-Led AI Certification to Combat Market Confusion
  • South Korean Chip Titans Clash Over Next-Gen HBM4 Memory
  • Hwangnam-ppang: Gyeongju's 85-Year-Old Secret to Sweet Success
  • Kia Inaugurates New CKD Plant in Kazakhstan, Accelerating Global Supply Chain Diversification
  • Korean Expatriates in Cambodia Face Economic Crisis and Anti-Korean Sentiment Amid Crime Wave

Most Viewed

1
Early Winter Chill Grips South Korea as Seoraksan Sees First Snow
2
Gyeongju International Marathon Elevated to 'Elite Label' Status, Welcomes Record 15,000 Runners  
3
South Korean Chip Titans Clash Over Next-Gen HBM4 Memory
4
Deadly Clan Clashes Erupt in Gaza as Israeli Forces Withdraw
5
Global Chip War Intensifies: Micron Woos Korean Engineers with Lucrative Offers, Up to 200 Million KRW Salary
광고문의
임시1
임시3
임시2

Hot Issue

Minister Choi Hwiyoung Vows 'One-Strike Out' Policy Amidst Surge in Abuse Reports

ROK President Lee Faces Major Diplomatic Test with APEC Super Week

Chinese Researchers Unveil Ultra-Fast Analog Chip, Targeting 1,000x Nvidia Speed

Melody in the OR: Parkinson's Patient Plays Clarinet During Brain Surgery

Let’s recycle the old blankets in Jeju Island’s closet instead of incinerating them.

Global Economic Times
korocamia@naver.com
CEO : LEE YEON-SIL
Publisher : KO YONG-CHUL
Registration number : Seoul, A55681
Registration Date : 2024-10-24
Youth Protection Manager: KO YONG-CHUL
Singapore Headquarters
5A Woodlands Road #11-34 The Tennery. S'677728
Korean Branch
Phone : +82(0)10 4724 5264
#304, 6 Nonhyeon-ro 111-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul
Copyright © Global Economic Times All Rights Reserved
  • 에이펙2025
  • APEC2025가이드북TV
  • 세종시
Search
Category
  • All articles
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life
  • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Ko Yong-chul Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
  • Cherry Garden Story
  • Multicultural News
  • Jobs & Workers
  • APEC 2025 KOREA GUIDE