TOKYO, JAPAN - A recent survey conducted by the Asahi Shimbun has revealed a significant lack of confidence among the Japanese populace regarding the United States' commitment to defending Japan in a potential crisis, despite the long-standing security treaty between the two nations. The poll, conducted via mail between February and early April, found that a mere 15% of the 1,899 respondents believe the U.S. would "genuinely defend Japan in the event of a contingency." A striking 77% expressed skepticism, stating they "do not think so."

The Asahi Shimbun noted that while direct comparisons with previous surveys are challenging due to methodological differences, the current level of doubt significantly surpasses past figures, which had skepticism towards U.S. defense hovering around the 60% mark at its peak. Analysts suggest that the "America First" approach championed by the Trump administration has likely eroded trust in the reliability of U.S. security guarantees.

The survey also shed light on evolving views regarding Japan's diplomatic direction. A substantial 68% of respondents favored Japan becoming "as independent as possible" in its foreign policy, nearly three times the 24% who preferred to "follow the U.S.'s intentions as much as possible." This indicates a growing sentiment within Japan for a more autonomous role on the international stage.

However, this desire for greater independence does not necessarily translate into a pivot away from the U.S. alliance towards closer ties with regional powers like China. A strong majority (66%) opposed the idea of shifting from a "pro-U.S. diplomacy" to prioritizing strengthened cooperation with Asian countries, with only 16% expressing support for such a change. This suggests a nuanced perspective where Japan seeks greater self-reliance while still valuing the U.S. alliance.

The survey also touched upon the sensitive issue of Japan's historical accountability. A majority (58%) of respondents believe Japan has "sufficiently apologized and compensated" for its past war and colonial rule, while 29% felt it has not. Furthermore, opinions were divided on the need for continued apologies from Japanese politicians regarding past historical issues, with 47% stating "there is no need to do so," slightly higher than the 44% who believed it is "necessary." Notably, a similar Asahi survey conducted a decade ago showed the opposite result, with a higher percentage favoring continued apologies. This shift in public opinion indicates a potential growing sentiment that Japan has adequately addressed its wartime past.

The findings of this survey underscore a complex and potentially evolving dynamic in the U.S.-Japan security alliance. While the formal treaty remains intact, the low level of public confidence in the U.S.'s commitment raises questions about the perceived strength and reliability of this cornerstone of East Asian security. Moreover, the growing desire for a more independent Japanese foreign policy, coupled with a cautious approach to closer ties with regional rivals, suggests a delicate balancing act for Tokyo as it navigates an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape. The survey results will likely fuel further debate within Japan regarding its security posture and diplomatic priorities in the years to come.