• 2026.05.08 (Fri)
  • All articles
  • LOGIN
  • JOIN
Global Economic Times
fashionrunwayshow2026
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Well+Being
  • Travel
  • Eco-News
  • Education
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life
    • International Student Report
    • With Ambassador
  • Column
    • Cho Kijo Column
    • Cherry Garden Story
    • Ko Yong-chul Column
    • Kim Seul-Ong Column
    • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
MENU
 
Home > World

US Supreme Court Partially Allows Trump's Birthright Citizenship Restrictions; Effective in 28 States

KO YONG-CHUL Reporter / Updated : 2025-06-28 07:59:57
  • -
  • +
  • Print

 

WASHINGTON D.C. – The U.S. Supreme Court has put a stop to lower courts' nationwide injunctions against President Donald Trump's "birthright citizenship restriction" executive order. This ruling effectively allows the executive order to be reimplemented in 28 states after a 30-day grace period, which is seen as providing legal legitimacy to the Trump administration's immigration policies.

On June 27 (local time), the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision with six conservative justices and three liberal justices, ruled that lower courts cannot issue nationwide injunctions to halt federal government policies. However, the Court reserved judgment on the constitutionality of the birthright citizenship policy itself. As a result, the executive order can take effect in 28 states, excluding the 22 states and Washington D.C. that filed lawsuits and obtained preliminary injunctions, starting 30 days from now.

This ruling addresses the nationwide injunctions issued by federal district courts in Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington state against the Trump executive order. The Supreme Court determined that courts overstepped their authority by issuing orders that extended beyond the scope of the original plaintiffs in the lawsuit. Justice Barrett emphasized, "While the executive branch must certainly follow the law, the judiciary also cannot overstep its role. Courts can only provide relief limited to individual cases and parties."

Conversely, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, along with Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented, arguing, "The majority ignored the unconstitutionality of the executive order and merely questioned the court's authority. Since the executive order is clearly unlawful, a nationwide injunction is necessary to block it."

On his first day in office, January 20, President Trump signed an executive order that denies citizenship to children born in the U.S. if neither parent is a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident. In response, attorneys general from 22 states led by Democratic governors, along with Washington D.C., immigrant rights organizations, and pregnant immigrants, filed constitutional challenges. Some lower courts had previously issued preliminary injunctions to halt the executive order's enforcement.

The 22 states where the birthright citizenship ban has been enjoined are Washington, Arizona, Illinois, Oregon, New Jersey, Massachusetts, California, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Michigan, Colorado, Delaware, Nevada, Hawaii, Maryland, Maine, Minnesota, New Mexico, Vermont, Wisconsin, and North Carolina. They argue that the policy violates the 14th Amendment's clause stating, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." This clause was adopted after the Civil War in 1868 to guarantee citizenship to those born after the emancipation of slaves.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) issued a statement strongly criticizing the executive order, calling it "plainly illegal and cruel" and asserting that "it should not be applied to anyone." After the ruling, Justice Sotomayor advised affected parents to "promptly file class-action lawsuits and seek temporary restraining orders," and the plaintiffs in the Maryland case applied for class-action certification just two hours after the ruling, signaling continued opposition.

This Supreme Court ruling is expected to intensify the debate over birthright citizenship. A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted from June 11-12 showed that only 24% of respondents supported abolishing birthright citizenship, while 52% opposed it. Notably, 84% of Democratic supporters opposed it, whereas among Republican supporters, 43% favored it and 24% opposed it, demonstrating stark political polarization. Immediately after the ruling, President Trump hailed it as a "huge win" on social media, interpreting the decision as a boost to his immigration policies. This ensures that birthright citizenship will be a significant issue in the upcoming elections.

[Copyright (c) Global Economic Times. All Rights Reserved.]

  • #NATO
  • #OTAN
  • #OECD
  • #G20
  • #globaleconomictimes
  • #Korea
  • #UNPEACEKOR
  • #micorea
  • #mykorea
  • #UN
  • #UNESCO
  • #nammidonganews
  • #sin
KO YONG-CHUL Reporter
KO YONG-CHUL Reporter
Reporter Page

Popular articles

  • President Lee’s Approval Rating Hits Record High of 67% for Second Consecutive Week: Gallup Korea

  • The AI Tsunami: Meta to Slash 10% of Workforce Amid Global Tech Purge

  • ElevenLabs Partners with Caring to Support ‘Senior Emotional Care’ via Voice AI

I like it
Share
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Kakaotalk
  • LINE
  • BAND
  • NAVER
  • https://www.globaleconomictimes.kr/article/1065567564467534 Copy URL copied.
Comments >

Comments 0

Weekly Hot Issue

  • South Korea’s KOSPI Surges to 7th in Global Market Cap, Overtaking Canada and UK
  • Global Pay Parity Demands Shaking Tech Giants: Samsung and SK Hynix Face Rising Labor Unrest in China
  • the 28th Overseas Koreans Literary Awards
  • Ambassador Hyuk-sang Sohn attended the "2026 Educational Community Sports Day" held at the Korean School of Paraguay on Friday, May 1.
  • Official Presentation of Credentials in Paraguay
  • U.S. World Cup "Host City Boom" Fizzles: Hotel Bookings Slump One Month Before Kickoff

Most Viewed

1
Iran Imposes Transit Fees on Strait of Hormuz Amid Escalating Maritime Tensions
2
Korea and Vietnam Forge Strategic Partnership in Science, Technology, and Innovation
3
Kurly Abandons 'All-Paper' Packaging Strategy Amid Rising Cost Pressures
4
80% of Enterprises Hit by 'AI Agent Anomalies': SailPoint Calls for Integrated Identity Governance
5
Tradition Meets the Public: Chungju’s Gugak Busking
광고문의
임시1
임시3
임시2

Hot Issue

Hyundai Motor Group Bets $700 Million on Mexico Amid Trade Policy Volatility

Honda Halts $15B Canada EV Plant Plans Amid Strategic Pivot to Hybrids

Digital Ghosts: The Rise of AI Ex-Partner Replicas and the Ethics of "Technological Mourning"

Kakao Hits Record Q1 Performance: Operating Profit Surges 66% as Focus Shifts to "Agentic AI"

Fashion Runway Show 2026

Global Economic Times
korocamia@naver.com
CEO : LEE YEON-SIL
Publisher : KO YONG-CHUL
Registration number : Seoul, A55681
Registration Date : 2024-10-24
Youth Protection Manager: KO YONG-CHUL
Singapore Headquarters
5A Woodlands Road #11-34 The Tennery. S'677728
Korean Branch
Phone : +82(0)10 4724 5264
#304, 6 Nonhyeon-ro 111-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul
Copyright © Global Economic Times All Rights Reserved
  • 에이펙2025
  • APEC2025가이드북TV
  • 반달곰 프로젝트
Search
Category
  • All articles
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Well+Being
  • Travel
  • Eco-News
  • Education
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life 
    • 전체
    • International Student Report
    • With Ambassador
  • Column 
    • 전체
    • Cho Kijo Column
    • Cherry Garden Story
    • Ko Yong-chul Column
    • Kim Seul-Ong Column
    • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
  • Multicultural News
  • Jobs & Workers