ANTALYA — The 31st United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP31) faced immediate friction on its opening day as developing and developed nations clashed over how to prioritize climate finance on the official agenda.

The summit, hosted in Antalya, Turkey, saw its opening plenary delayed by roughly 90 minutes on Monday as delegates wrangled late into the night. At the heart of the dispute was a push by developing nations to formally integrate discussions on scaling up adaptation finance.

The African Group formally requested a dedicated agenda item to map out implementation strategies for a target agreed upon at last year’s COP30 in Belém: tripling adaptation finance by 2035 to bolster flood and drought resilience in vulnerable regions. Despite these efforts, consensus could not be reached, and the separate agenda item was ultimately dropped.

COP President Murat Kurum sought to ease tensions during the opening session, assuring delegates that the omission would not preclude future discussions on the matter. Nevertheless, nations like India expressed deep regret over the exclusion.

Independent environmental watchdogs note that even if international public adaptation funding triples, it will barely bridge the immense financial gap. According to United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) estimates, developing economies will require approximately $305 billion annually by 2035 to adapt to climate impacts. Meeting the Belém target of a threefold increase would still only cover between 20% and 29% of actual requirements.

Outside the main negotiation halls, outside pressures mirrored the indoor friction. Greenpeace activists staged a protest inside the Antalya Expo Center on Monday, unfurling banners demanding a decisive end to fossil fuels.

Inside the venue, procedural battles spilled over into the 2-year "climate finance work program," which was successfully placed on the agenda. This framework is designed to track progress toward the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG)—the commitment established in Baku in 2024 to mobilize $1.3 trillion annually in climate finance by 2035 under Article 9 of the Paris Agreement.

Even after this framework was adopted, procedural disputes persisted. The European Union argued that the framework was approved last year with the explicit understanding that it would not be spun off into fragmented sub-agendas, citing pre-agreed timelines. India countered that the consensus in Baku actually intended for the work program to be treated as an independent agenda item.

Additional financial and thematic items faced similar resistance. Deliberations regarding replenishment strategies for the Green Climate Fund (GCF) were folded into existing reporting guidelines rather than receiving standalone status. Furthermore, the seventh review of the UNFCCC financial mechanism was deferred to COP32, while trade-related climate measures and mountain ecosystem protections failed to secure agenda spots. Meanwhile, a proposal regarding "sustainable diets," initially introduced in June, was withdrawn by Comoros.

As negotiations proceed, delegates face mounting pressure to bridge deep-seated divisions over transparency, funding accountability, and the realistic pace of climate support for vulnerable states.

[Copyright (c) Global Economic Times. All Rights Reserved.]