• 2026.03.22 (Sun)
  • All articles
  • LOGIN
  • JOIN
Global Economic Times
fashionrunwayshow2026
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Well+Being
  • Travel
  • Eco-News
  • Education
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life
    • International Student Report
    • With Ambassador
  • Column
    • Cho Kijo Column
    • Cherry Garden Story
    • Ko Yong-chul Column
    • Kim Seul-Ong Column
    • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
MENU
 
Home > Industry

Nuclear Debate Ignites in Australia: Grassroots Movement vs. Scientific Evidence

Desk / Updated : 2025-03-23 14:55:36
  • -
  • +
  • Print

Canberra, Australia – A growing grassroots movement, Nuclear for Australia, is pushing for a national dialogue on the potential role of nuclear power in the country’s energy future. The group, spearheaded by former ANSTO CEO Dr. Adi Paterson and backed by Dick Smith, announced that over 100,000 Australians have signed a petition demanding the removal of the current nuclear power ban.

"Australians are demanding a practical solution to our energy needs," stated Will Shackel, founder of Nuclear for Australia, citing the overwhelming support for their petition.

However, the movement's call for a science-driven conversation faces strong opposition from established scientific bodies. The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), a leading authority on scientific and industrial research, has released findings that cast doubt on the viability of nuclear power in Australia.

According to the CSIRO's recent report, nuclear energy is neither cost-competitive nor timely in addressing Australia’s emissions reduction goals. The report highlights that renewable energy sources remain the most economically efficient option, even when considering storage and transmission costs.

Furthermore, the rising costs of international nuclear projects, such as the UK’s Sizewell C, underscore the financial burden associated with nuclear energy. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) warns that implementing similar projects in Australia would lead to substantial increases in household electricity bills.

Critics argue that pursuing nuclear energy would divert valuable time and resources from the immediate and effective implementation of renewable energy solutions. They assert that the current nuclear ban serves to protect Australia from an expensive and unnecessary distraction.

As the debate intensifies, policymakers are faced with the challenge of balancing public sentiment with scientific evidence, as they navigate Australia’s complex energy landscape.

[Copyright (c) Global Economic Times. All Rights Reserved.]

  • #globaleconomictimes
  • #글로벌이코노믹타임즈
  • #한국
  • #중기청
  • #재외동포청
  • #외교부
  • #micorea
  • #mykorea
  • #newsk
  • #nammidonganews
  • #singaporenewsk
Desk
Desk

Popular articles

  • The Coronation of a New Queen: Kim Gil-li Clinches Double Gold, While a Tearful Farewell Marks the End of an Era

  • US House Probes Coupang Over ‘Discriminatory’ Korean Regulations: Potential Catalyst for Section 301 Investigation?

  • South Korea’s Bakery Giants Slash Prices as Government Ramps Up Pressure on Food Inflation

I like it
Share
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Kakaotalk
  • LINE
  • BAND
  • NAVER
  • https://www.globaleconomictimes.kr/article/1065592477064774 Copy URL copied.
Comments >

Comments 0

Weekly Hot Issue

  • Coway Clinches Top Honor at "Water Taste Awards" for 7th Consecutive Year
  • HP Targets Korea as Strategic Hub for 'Edge AI' Expansion, Seeking Startup Partnerships
  • Pearl Abyss’s 'Crimson Desert' Shatters Records with 2 Million Copies Sold on Day One
  • "BTS Over Books?" Indian Academies Issue Emergency Notices as Students Plot Mass Absences for Comeback Live
  • Naver to Shut Down Men's Fashion Service 'MR.' to Launch Expanded AI-Driven Fashion Platform
  • JBNU and SKKU Researchers Achieve Breakthrough in "Dream Material" MXene, Setting New World Records in Performance

Most Viewed

1
An Open Letter to BTS On the Eve of a Historic Performance
2
From Industrial Capital to Tourism Mecca... Ulsan Makes a Bold Move with ‘Experiential Content’ in 2026
3
Ko Sang-goo, President of World Federation of Korean Associations, Elected as First Private Sector Chair of World Korean Community Leaders Convention
4
It is Time for BTS’s Fandom, ARMY, to Step Forward
5
Korean Stock Market Plunges: Circuit Breaker and Sidecar Triggered Amid Geopolitical Crisis
광고문의
임시1
임시3
임시2

Hot Issue

Vishay Unveils Ultra-Compact 0404 RGB LED with Independent Chip Control for Enhanced Color Precision

Coway Clinches Top Honor at "Water Taste Awards" for 7th Consecutive Year

AI Medical Ecosystem in Focus: KIMES 2026 Opens in Seoul as Global Healthcare Hub

Netanyahu Declares Decisive Blow to Iran’s Nuclear and Missile Programs, Signals Early End to War

Let’s recycle the old blankets in Jeju Island’s closet instead of incinerating them.

Global Economic Times
korocamia@naver.com
CEO : LEE YEON-SIL
Publisher : KO YONG-CHUL
Registration number : Seoul, A55681
Registration Date : 2024-10-24
Youth Protection Manager: KO YONG-CHUL
Singapore Headquarters
5A Woodlands Road #11-34 The Tennery. S'677728
Korean Branch
Phone : +82(0)10 4724 5264
#304, 6 Nonhyeon-ro 111-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul
Copyright © Global Economic Times All Rights Reserved
  • 에이펙2025
  • APEC2025가이드북TV
  • 독도는우리땅
Search
Category
  • All articles
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Well+Being
  • Travel
  • Eco-News
  • Education
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life 
    • 전체
    • International Student Report
    • With Ambassador
  • Column 
    • 전체
    • Cho Kijo Column
    • Cherry Garden Story
    • Ko Yong-chul Column
    • Kim Seul-Ong Column
    • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
  • Multicultural News
  • Jobs & Workers